You've got two offers on the table: $95K in Austin, $130K in San Francisco. The San Francisco offer looks 37% better. It usually isn't. This guide walks through the exact framework we use to compare job offers across US cities — and shows why the 'obviously bigger' number is often the worse deal.
The 4-Step Offer Comparison Framework
- Step 1 — Convert gross salary to net take-home (subtract federal, state, and FICA taxes).
- Step 2 — Subtract housing at the specific rent you'd actually pay in that city.
- Step 3 — Subtract fixed monthly costs (groceries, transport, utilities, healthcare).
- Step 4 — What remains is your monthly savings capacity. That's the number to compare.
Step 1: Gross to Net
Federal tax and FICA (7.65%) hit every US salary. State tax varies wildly. Rough take-home percentages on a $100K salary:
| State type | Example State | Effective Tax | Take-home on $100K |
|---|
Step 2: Real Housing Costs, Not City Averages
City-wide rent averages are misleading. What matters is what you'd actually pay in the neighborhood you'd realistically live in. A 1-bedroom in San Francisco's Marina averages $3,900; in Oakland's Fruitvale, $1,800 — same commute range, half the price.
Do this properly: pick 2–3 realistic neighborhoods on a map (based on commute + safety + lifestyle), and use the median rent in those neighborhoods — not the city average, which is skewed by luxury towers.
Step 3: Everything Else
Beyond rent, monthly fixed costs are surprisingly consistent for a single person across US cities. Budget roughly:
- Groceries: $400–$650/month depending on cost tier
- Transport: $100 (transit city) to $600 (car-dependent city, including insurance and gas)
- Utilities + internet: $180–$260/month
- Healthcare: $350–$550/month if not fully employer-covered
- Personal / leisure: $300–$500/month baseline
Total non-housing baseline: roughly $1,400–$2,300/month for a single person, $2,400–$3,600 for a couple. Add this to rent for your total monthly cost.
Step 4: The Real Comparison Table
Let's run our two example offers through the full framework:
| Line | Austin $95K | San Francisco $130K |
|---|
The 'Relocation Salary Premium' You Should Demand
If you're being asked to relocate from a cheaper city, calculate the minimum raise you should demand to stay financially neutral. As a rule of thumb:
- Low-cost → mid-cost city: demand at least 20–30% more.
- Low-cost → high-cost city (LA, Seattle, Boston): demand 40–60% more.
- Any city → NYC, SF, or San Jose: demand 60–90% more — just to break even.
- Any city → smaller / cheaper city: you can often accept a 15–25% cut and still save more.
Non-Financial Factors That Still Matter
Money isn't everything. Commute length, climate, career runway, family proximity, and lifestyle fit all affect whether the 'financially better' offer is actually the better offer. But quantifying the money side first strips the emotion out — then you know exactly how much you're paying for the lifestyle you want.
For a deeper city-by-city look at where salaries stretch furthest, read our sister guide.
Worked Example: Remote-First Trade-Down
A remote worker earning $110K in Seattle relocates to Pittsburgh and takes a nominal $10K pay cut ($100K new salary). Result: Seattle take-home ~$76,000/year with $3,800 monthly cost = $30,400 annual savings. Pittsburgh take-home ~$71,000 with $2,760 monthly cost = $37,880 annual savings. Net effect: +$7,500/year saved despite the 'pay cut'.